Description | Ensure that the policy went as planned |
Question | Did the policy proceed faithfully in accordance with the schedule? |
Check criteria | Measure | Score | Compliance with plan |
Very good | 4 | When two-thirds (⅔) or more of the schedule against the plan was completed |
Good | 3 | When a half or more to less than two-thirds (⅔) of the schedule against the plan was completed |
Acceptable | 2 | When one-thirds (⅓) or more to less than a half of the schedule against the plan was completed |
Poor | 1 | When less than one-thirds (⅓) of the schedule against the plan was completed |
Very poor | 0 | When the policy was NOT driven at all |
* Note. 1. In case of less than two-thirds of the schedule compared to the plan, if the objective evidence is provided that the schedule was delayed due to unavoidable external circumstances (budget change, an order from higher institutions or organizations, etc.), judge as “Agree (3 points).”2. The schedule compared to the plan is calculated as maximum of the ratio of progress time to total schedule or input cost to total budget. For example, if the policy has been advanced about four months compared to the 12-month schedule and 1.2 billion of the total 2 billion budgets have been used, the schedule against the plan is determined as max [4/12, 12/20] = 0.6 and the judgement is “Agree (3 points).” |
Source of data | - Gantt chart of policy implementation plan and a current progress; Documents showing a current progress- Report on last year's performance and this year's plan for informatization in the Act on Defense Informatization [8] |