Table 3. Experimental data after algorithm application.
| 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 |
1 | 93.7 | 94.5 | 89.3 | 92.3 | 91.2 | 93.4 | 88.6 | 93.1 | 97.1 | 92.8 |
2 | 92.8 | 92.3 | 85.2 | 96.2 | 83.5 | 96.5 | 87.5 | 89.2 | 86.6 | 92.6 |
3 | 89.9 | 88.3 | 86.2 | 94.3 | 95.3 | 92.3 | 95.3 | 88.3 | 89.3 | 89.3 |
4 | 95.3 | 95.3 | 84.3 | 95.3 | 86.1 | 94.9 | 94.7 | 85.1 | 89.4 | 86.3 |
5 | 90.3 | 98.3 | 92.3 | 95.2 | 88.3 | 95.8 | 96.3 | 86.2 | 91.0 | 87.5 |
6 | 92.1 | 89.3 | 98.2 | 93.2 | 91.3 | 94.7 | 98.3 | 87.3 | 92.6 | 95.6 |
7 | 90.2 | 85.4 | 92.3 | 93.3 | 90.2 | 95.2 | 86.3 | 92.4 | 85.6 | 94.3 |
8 | 91.9 | 85.6 | 93.4 | 93.5 | 95.3 | 90.3 | 90.2 | 95.0 | 87.5 | 89.3 |
9 | 85.3 | 87.3 | 90.6 | 96.3 | 92.3 | 91.3 | 97.1 | 83.4 | 86.9 | 93.5 |
10 | 84.3 | 79.3 | 89.3 | 96.6 | 95.9 | 92.6 | 92.3 | 89.3 | 95.3 | 95.5 |