Table 2. Comparison of conventional and proposed methods.

	SVM with HOG	Adaboost with Haar	SVM with CtC	Proposed method
Number of signs	3168	3168	3168	3168
Detection	2968	3059	2809	3129
Recognition	2836	2890	2747	3027
false Recognition	332	188	421	141
speed	48ms	45ms	35ms	46ms
Recognition rate	89.5%	91.2%	86.7%	95.5%