| Description | Check that there is no overlap between performance indicators |
| Question | Is there no overlap between performance indicators? |
| Check criteria | Measure | Score | Redundancy of performance indicators |
| Very good | 4 | When there is NO redundancy between all performance indicators |
| Good | 3 | When there is redundancy between less than one-thirds (⅓) of performance indicators |
| Acceptable | 2 | When there is redundancy between one-thirds (⅓) or more to less than a half of indicators |
| Poor | 1 | When there is redundancy between a half or more to less than two-thirds (⅔) of indicators |
| Very poor | 0 | When there is redundancy between two-thirds (⅔) or more of performance indicators |
| * Note. 1. Redundancy of performance indicator means that there are many or few overlapping indicators that measure similar performance. The level of redundancy is determined using the number of indicators involved in the redundancy. For reference, if four (A, B, C, D) out of ten performance indicators (A-J) are involved in overlapping, regardless of the type of duplication (similar between A and B, similar between C and D or all similar in A, B, C, D) the level of redundancy is judged to be four-tenths.2. Whether it's a duplicate is determined using the expertise of individual evaluator. |
| Source of data | - Checklist that checks the redundancy of performance indicators- Performance indicators item |