Table 7. Indicator <B-3> Fidelity of policy analysis.

Indicator	Policy-making >> Appropriateness of policy-making process > Fidelity of policy analysis
Description	Check whether a systematic analysis was performed when making the policy
Question	Have you conducted the core analysis (effect analysis, pros and cons analysis) and additional analysis (other analysis besides the core analysis) to make the policy?
Check criteria	Measure	Score	Core analysis (effect analysis)	Core analysis (pros and cons analysis)	Additional analysis
	Very good	4	When conduct an effect analysis such as benefit cost analysis	When conduct a pros and cons analysis such as SWOT analysis	When conduct an additional quantitative and qualitative analysis
	Good	3	When conduct an effect analysis such as benefit cost analysis	When conduct a pros and cons analysis such as SWOT analysis	When NO conduct an additional quantitative and qualitative analysis
	Acceptable	2	When either an effect analysis or a pros and cons analysis is conducted		When conduct additional quantitative and qualitative analysis
	Poor	1	When either an effect analysis or a pros and cons analysis is conducted		When NO conduct additional quantitative and qualitative analysis
			When neither an effect analysis nor a pros and cons analysis is conducted		When conduct additional quantitative and qualitative analysis
	Very poor	0	When neither an effect analysis nor a pros and cons analysis is conducted		When NO conduct additional quantitative and qualitative analysis
	* Note. If a simple expert survey or interview is used, it is interpreted as additional analysis.
Source of data	- Result of effect analysis (benefit cost analysis), pros and cons analysis, etc.- Expert survey / interview output (document and recorded file) for policy-making- Requirement institution document for informatization project