Table 8. Indicator <B-4> Fidelity of post preparation.

Indicator	Policy-making >> Appropriateness of policy-making process > Fidelity of post preparation
Description	Check whether side effects, which are predicted by the policy, were reviewed well when making the policy
Question	Are the expected side effects and solutions fully reviewed?
Check criteria	Measure	Score	Level of side effect review	Level of alternative review
	Very good	4	When reviewed side effects on four perspectives (required personnel, budget, necessary system, and conflict among stakeholders)	When suggested all alternatives to side effects on four perspectives
	Good	3	When reviewed side effects on four perspectives	When suggested some alternatives to side effects on four perspectives
			When reviewed side effects on three of the four perspectives	When suggested all alternatives to side effects on three of the four perspectives
	Acceptable	2	When reviewed side effects on three of the four perspectives	When suggested some alternatives to side effects on three of the four perspectives
			When reviewed side effects on two of the four perspectives	When suggested all alternatives to side effects on two of the four perspectives
	Poor	1	When reviewed side effects on two of the four perspectives	When suggested some alternatives to side effects on two of the four perspectives
			When reviewed side effects on one of the four perspectives	When suggested alternatives to side effects on one of the four perspectives
	Very poor	0	When reviewed side effects on one of the four perspectives	When NOT suggested any alternative to side effects
			When NO reviewed side effects	-
Source of data	- List of required personnel, labor cost, and budget statement to need for policy-making- Survey data on the necessity of policy-making studied before policy-making- Formal document containing the reasons for the rejection of the proposal- Report on alternatives against four expected side effects